header-logo header-logo

08 September 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , Technology , CPR
printer mail-detail

Litigation: what next?

Dominic Regan looks to the future of civil litigation

Where to begin? There are so many proposals whirling around despite the fact that the civil process underwent the single most radical overhaul but three years ago with the Jackson reforms.

Costs capers

Indeed, it was Sir Rupert Jackson who got the bandwagon rolling again with his January 2016 proposal for a universal fixed costs regime to capture all claims worth up to £250,000 in value.

It is true that the eventual extension of fixed costs was identified in his final report. The shock was the level up to which he suggested they might apply. Such was the outcry from myriad sectors of the profession that three months later, in a speech delivered at the Law Society, he recognised that reform might not be immediate nor would the proposed ceiling be accepted. For so many, £250,000 did not represent “the foothills” of multi-track; more like the giddy heights.

Make no mistake. There is inexorable pressure to roll out fixed costs. They

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll