header-logo header-logo

31 January 2020
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Litigation trends: technology, diversity, and Brexit

Law firms should embrace technology, flexible hours and remote working to break down barriers in the legal profession, the President of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) has said

The annual NLJ and LSLA Litigation Trends Survey, published this week, reveals that 83% of the Capital’s litigators believe more needs to be done to improve diversity and inclusion in the profession. One respondent said that BAME (Black and minority ethnic) lawyers were prevalent at the middle levels of the profession but talent ‘is not being progressed to the higher levels’ in the legal profession.

Respondents were asked what areas firms should focus on to boost diversity and inclusion. The top three areas given were: encouraging flexible working and job sharing (81%); promoting and supporting social mobility (77%); and focusing on workplace culture to create a place where every voice is welcomed, heard and respected (75%).

Julian Acratopulo, LSLA President and Clifford Chance partner, said: ‘I firmly believe that technology is absolutely key to this.

‘Diversity and technology go hand in hand, and need to be viewed as such.  Better digitisation opens up more opportunities for lawyers to work flexibly or remotely (as cases can be conducted online rather than in person).  This helps to break down the barriers that can dissuade people from joining or progressing in the profession.’

Brexit could boost profits: two-thirds predict an ‘inevitable’ post-Brexit spike in litigation affecting cross-border businesses. Only 28% expect a material flight of litigation work from London after Brexit.

More than a third (38%) perceived the litigation market as unchanged in the past two or three years, and 44% said it was growing.

Moreover, the cost of litigation in London is not a significant factor for clients, according to 58% of litigators. Multiple respondents said London remains favourable due to its reputation for high quality judges, judicial independence and procedural features.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll