header-logo header-logo

Litigation trends: technology, diversity, and Brexit

31 January 2020
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Law firms should embrace technology, flexible hours and remote working to break down barriers in the legal profession, the President of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) has said

The annual NLJ and LSLA Litigation Trends Survey, published this week, reveals that 83% of the Capital’s litigators believe more needs to be done to improve diversity and inclusion in the profession. One respondent said that BAME (Black and minority ethnic) lawyers were prevalent at the middle levels of the profession but talent ‘is not being progressed to the higher levels’ in the legal profession.

Respondents were asked what areas firms should focus on to boost diversity and inclusion. The top three areas given were: encouraging flexible working and job sharing (81%); promoting and supporting social mobility (77%); and focusing on workplace culture to create a place where every voice is welcomed, heard and respected (75%).

Julian Acratopulo, LSLA President and Clifford Chance partner, said: ‘I firmly believe that technology is absolutely key to this.

‘Diversity and technology go hand in hand, and need to be viewed as such.  Better digitisation opens up more opportunities for lawyers to work flexibly or remotely (as cases can be conducted online rather than in person).  This helps to break down the barriers that can dissuade people from joining or progressing in the profession.’

Brexit could boost profits: two-thirds predict an ‘inevitable’ post-Brexit spike in litigation affecting cross-border businesses. Only 28% expect a material flight of litigation work from London after Brexit.

More than a third (38%) perceived the litigation market as unchanged in the past two or three years, and 44% said it was growing.

Moreover, the cost of litigation in London is not a significant factor for clients, according to 58% of litigators. Multiple respondents said London remains favourable due to its reputation for high quality judges, judicial independence and procedural features.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll