header-logo header-logo

17 May 2013 / David Greene
Issue: 7560 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Litigation hotspots

David Greene predicts where the main areas of dispute will arise as a result of the civil litigation shake up

1 April has come and gone. We now live in the partial light of the Jackson World. Of course, the changes invoked by his proposals are but a small part of what happened on 1 April and since. No doubt of equal or greater importance have been the cut in the scope of legal aid and the cuts in recoverable fees for road traffic accident (RTA) claims. Clearly in both the cuts in scope and the Jackson changes, the access that claimants have to the justice process has been cut substantially.

A waiting game
It is, of course, only a partial light because everyone on the claimants’ side was busily signing up conditional fee agreements (CFAs) and after the event (ATE) insurance policies until the last minute (we received a notice of a CFA at 11.59pm on 31 March). Whether they did what they needed to secure recovery will play out in the coming years.

It will be some time before we see the impact

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll