header-logo header-logo

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Litigation funding gap

"Knowledge gap" between private practice lawyers & their clients

Solicitors and barristers are not doing enough to keep in-house counsel informed about the potential of litigation funding, new research has shown.

More than 80% of law firms and nearly half of chambers say they discuss litigation funding with their clients, according to a survey by Harbour Litigation Funding. The top three benefits cited were risk minimisation, cost and cash-flow control, and access to justice.  

However, the survey found a “knowledge gap” between private practice lawyers and their clients—only one in five in-house counsel were aware of litigation funding and none of them had any recollection of discussing the option with their external lawyers.

One in-house counsel said she was not “hugely familiar” with litigation funding and that law firms could do more to raise awareness “as to exactly what the tools are and what they can offer”.

Susan Dunn, Harbour’s head of litigation funding, says there is “more work still to be done to educate in-house counsel and dispel certain myths which develop from a lack of understanding”.

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll