header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009 / Glynis Craig
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

In the line of fire

Glynis Craig says all soldiers have human rights

For the first time a domestic court has considered whether members of the British Armed Services serving abroad are under the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the Human Rights Act (HRA 1998).

On 19 May 2009, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v R (Catherine Smith) and HM Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire and Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervener) [2009] EWCA Civ 441, [2009] All ER (D) 152 (May).

The Equality and Human Rights Commission intervened in the case to argue that, as UK soldiers are serving abroad under the jurisdiction of the UK government, they should also receive the protection granted to other British citizens.

The court found that these soldiers were protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and HRA 1998 whether they were physically on an armed forces base or elsewhere. As a result, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) will have to provide proper protection to all soldiers serving overseas and hold independent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll