header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009 / Glynis Craig
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

In the line of fire

Glynis Craig says all soldiers have human rights

For the first time a domestic court has considered whether members of the British Armed Services serving abroad are under the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the Human Rights Act (HRA 1998).

On 19 May 2009, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v R (Catherine Smith) and HM Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire and Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervener) [2009] EWCA Civ 441, [2009] All ER (D) 152 (May).

The Equality and Human Rights Commission intervened in the case to argue that, as UK soldiers are serving abroad under the jurisdiction of the UK government, they should also receive the protection granted to other British citizens.

The court found that these soldiers were protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and HRA 1998 whether they were physically on an armed forces base or elsewhere. As a result, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) will have to provide proper protection to all soldiers serving overseas and hold independent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll