header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018 / Brice Dickson
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail

In the line of duty: a year in the Supreme Court

nlj_7776_dickson

The Supreme Court in 2017. Brice Dickson reviews the personnel, judgments & output

2017 was an eventful year for the UK Supreme Court. It began with 11 Justices in post, each deliberating on Gina Miller’s claim that Article 50 of the Treaty for European Union should be triggered by Parliament and not by government. They held in her favour by 8 to 3 ([2017] UKSC 5), affirming the decision of the Divisional Court. The year ended with three new Justices in post, plus a different President and Deputy President.

Lord Neuberger, the outgoing President, retired in September, four months short of his 70th birthday. Lord Clarke retired at the same time, eight months short of his 75th birthday. Lord Neuberger can sit as a member of the supplementary panel of retired judges until 2023. Lord Toulson retired in September 2016 but sat as a supplementary judge on six occasions in early 2017. He delivered the Court’s sole judgment in two cases. Sadly, while undergoing heart surgery in June, he died. Lord Collins, who retired in 2011 upon reaching

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll