header-logo header-logo

19 May 2011
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Limitation of action

Renwick and another v Simon and Michael Brooke Architects and other companies [2011] EWHC 874 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 36 (May)

The starting date for the three-year period under s 14A of the Limitation Act 1980 was the “earliest date” on which any given claimant had the knowledge required for bringing a claim in damages in relation to the damage with which the claim was concerned and the right to bring the claim.

Knowledge in that context did not mean certainty, but knowledge of sufficient essential facts or matters to institute either a claim or the taking of advice or the collation of evidence would often suffice to institute the “earliest date”. That “knowledge” was of the material facts about the damage for which damages were claimed and of other facts relevant to the claim.

Those were such facts as would lead a reasonable person who had suffered the damage in question to consider it sufficiently serious to justify instituting proceedings for damages; such facts included that the damage in question was attributable at least in part to the basic acts or omissions said ultimately

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll