header-logo header-logo

Lift off for Budgetary Control*

HH Simon Brown QC continues his exclusive NLJ online series on costs management post-Jackson

So, what is “budgetary control”?
Budgetary control is a control technique whereby results are compared with budgets.

  • Any differences (variances) are made the responsibility of key individuals who can either exercise control action or revise the original budgets.
  • Control is provided by comparisons of actual results against budget plan. Departures from budget can then be investigated and the reasons for the differences can be divided into controllable and non-controllable factors.
  • Budgetary control enables remedial action to be taken as variances emerge.

Budgetary control will be the most important task of the party’s case manager/partner because CPR 3.18 provides (Rule 11) that when assessing costs on the standard basis the court will:

  • Have regard to the receiving party’s last approved or agreed budget for each Phase of the proceedings (CPR 3.18(a)); and
  • Not depart from such approved or agreed budget unless satisfied there is good reason to do so (CPR 3.18 (b)).

If you are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll