header-logo header-logo

Life in the automated lane

49941
The legal & regulatory landscape surrounding automated vehicles is taking shape: David Mason considers the questions still to be answered
  • The implementation of Pt 1 of the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 opens the door for fundamental changes to the civil liability of drivers and insurers.

With the recent implementation of Pt 1 of the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 (AEVA 2018), the government has taken the first steps towards the lawful use of vehicles on our roads which are controlled by technology, not the driver.

AEVA 2018 is not concerned with the driver assistance devices now commonly available on cars, such as active cruise control or lane monitoring. The legal position is clear so far as they are concerned: the driver remains in charge and fully responsible for the operation of the vehicle.

AEVA 2018 introduces a new class of vehicle—the ‘automated vehicle’—and new concepts of liability for their drivers, and crucially, their insurers.

What’s automated?

An automated vehicle is one which is listed by the Secretary of State under AEVA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll