header-logo header-logo

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Life at the employed Bar

Employed barristers have higher levels of wellbeing, are more diverse and enjoy greater flexibility and work/life balance than the self-employed Bar, the Bar Council has found.

However, it also discovered the employed Bar experiences bullying and harassment at similar levels to the whole Bar, has far fewer King’s Counsel, and is concerned about career progression and income. 

Of the 17,000 barristers currently in practice, more than 3,000 (18%) are employed. The Bar Council report, ‘Life at the employed Bar’, published last week, is based on analysis of data on the demographics and working lives of employed barristers as well as focus group discussions, and makes nine recommendations.

Stuart Alford KC, chair of the Bar Council employed barristers’ committee, said: ‘The recommendations we’re adopting provide a clear steer on things we must improve: better information about the benefits of a career at the employed Bar, targeted support on career progression—particularly when it comes to judicial appointments for employed barristers, a greater focus on tackling bullying and harassment within the employed arm of profession, and support in developing networks for employed barristers throughout England & Wales.’

The report paints a picture of employed barristers’ working lives. More than half work in the public sector and nearly a quarter work in legal firms. The main areas are crime (34%), commercial and financial services (14%) and public law (13%).

The employed Bar is more diverse, with women making up 49% (compared to 37% of the self-employed Bar) and nearly one in five from an ethnic minority background (compared to 15% of the self-employed Bar).

Only 52 employed barristers (2.6%) are King’s Counsel.

The vast majority, 86%, report a sense of collaboration and co-operation in their workplace. However, 31% have personally experienced bullying, discrimination or harassment at work. Women, people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and those who work in solicitors’ firms are more likely to have been subjected to this.

Nick Vinneal KC, Bar Council chair, said: ‘This report provides a clear way forward for the Bar Council, working with others, to promote, champion, and support employed barristers as members of our One Bar.’

Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll