header-logo header-logo

29 September 2021
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Life at the Bar can be grim

Nearly one in three barristers (30%) have reported being bullied, harassed and/or discriminated against at work within the previous two years, research has found

The Bar Council’s 2021 Working Lives Survey, published this week, uncovered the devastating figure, up from 21% in the last survey, in 2017.

In response to the findings, the Bar Council said tackling bullying, harassment and discrimination would continue to be a priority. It has set up an anonymous reporting app Talk to Spot, is working with the senior judiciary to stamp out judicial bullying of barristers and published a Bar Council Guide on judicial bullying in 2019.

Nearly two-thirds (63%) reported the pandemic has had a negative impact on their practice, with criminal barristers faring worst overall (79%). On new ways of working post-pandemic, the majority want to work in a different way―only 23% opposed change. Of those in favour of change, 60% want more remote working and 42% want more flexible working patterns.

The Bar Council is currently drawing up a flexible working guide for the Bar.

Government plans to shrink the backlog through Extended Operating Hours in courts found little favour with barristers― only 9% approved.

Derek Sweeting QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘Work has already begun in the last year or so to tackle the issue of bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar, and we are making the Bar a more accessible profession in terms of its working practices.

‘The Bar Council’s Modernising the Bar programme lies at the heart of this effort.’

The Modernising the Bar programme focuses on women and under-represented groups, aiming to: make distribution of work fairer, including briefing practices, marketing opportunities and monitoring; and improve practice management, including supporting new and returning barristers and supporting progression.

Some 3,479 barristers responded to the survey.

Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll