header-logo header-logo

04 April 2014 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Life after death

Jonathan Herring explores a clear case of compassion from the courts

It was one of those cases where the correct result seemed obvious, but the law stood in the way. A grieving widow wanted to store her dead husband’s sperm so that one day she might have the child they had planned together. It would have been a hard hearted judge who stuck to the letter of the law and denied her application. Mrs Justice Hogg in Warren v Care Fertility (Northampton) Limited [2014] EWHC 602 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 65 (Mar) was able to see a way through the legal quagmire to produce the compassionate result.

 

Tragic circumstances

Warren Brewer had died on 7 February 2012 at the tragically young age of 32 from a brain tumour. When he commenced radiotherapy for treatment of the tumour in 2005 his consultant referred him to the Care Fertility Clinic in Northampton so that samples of his sperm could be taken and frozen for use in future reproduction. He signed the clinic’s standard consent form which allowed for sperm to be stored for three

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll