header-logo header-logo

Life after death?

27 March 2008 / Alex Craig
Issue: 7314 / Categories: Features , Public , Data protection , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Alex Craig examines how the case of Peter Pan might impact on the future of copyright protection

“All children, except one, grow up...” This is the opening sentence of a captivating story most of us will be familiar with—the story of Peter Pan, a young boy who declined adulthood, creating his own world of Indians, pirates and fairies. Although staying safe in Never-Never Land helped him avoid entering the grown-up world, one thing that couldn’t be avoided was the inevitable expiration of copyright in the work in which he appears. On 31 December 2007 copyright in Peter Pan expired in theory, making it freely available to the general public. This would have had severe repercussions had the author, JM Barrie, not bequeathed all rights to the work to in 1929. ’s reasons are subject to some debate, but it is assumed that wanted rights in his works to pass to an organisation that would entertain and look after the one thing in life that most concerned him: children.

 

CURRENT PROTECTION

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll