header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Libel & slander

Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd and another; Lachaux v AOL (UK) Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334, [2017] All ER (D) 85 (Sep)

Having outlined the meaning and effect of, and the proper approach to, s 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that, whatever doubts there were about the judge’s approach, he had reached a conclusion as to the overall outcome which he had been fully justified in reaching. Accordingly, it dismissed the defendants’ appeal against the judge’s decision that the defendants’ articles had involved publication of defamatory statements which had caused, or had been likely to cause, serious harm to the claimant.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll