header-logo header-logo

15 March 2013
Issue: 7552 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Libel and slander—Particulars—Defamatory meaning

Tesla Motors Ltd and another v British Broadcasting Corporation [2013] EWCA Civ 152, [2013] All ER (D) 16 (Mar)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Maurice Kay VP, Moore-Bick and Rimer LJJ, 5 Mar 2013

The BBC programme Top Gear did not make the general public believe that the manufacturer of an electric car had grossly misled potential purchasers of the vehicle about its range and accordingly had not libeled the manufacturer.

Richard Spearman QC and William McCormick QC (instructed by Carter-Ruck) for the claimants. Andrew Caldecott QC and Catrin Evans (instructed by BBC Litigation Department) for the defendant.

The claimants manufactured and distributed electric cars. They produced a vehicle known as the “Roadster”. During 2008, two Roadsters were reviewed by the Top Gear programme made by the defendant. The film, which lasted about 10 minutes, was included in the edition of the programme broadcast on 14 December 2008. It had since been shown on several television channels on several occasions and remained available to view on the Top Gear website. In March 2011, the claimants issued proceedings against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll