header-logo header-logo

Liability: delivering the goods?

174059
An unusual case has served up questions about vicarious liability & the gig economy. Ross Fletcher looks at the takeaways
  • Examines a case concerning a self-employed Deliveroo rider who caused grievous bodily harm to a customer. Deliveroo has disputed liability.
  • Considers the case law to explore the relationship between the rider and Deliveroo, exploring how the law on vicarious liability may be applied to modern work situations.

Ordering takeaway pizza does not usually incur a risk of personal injury. However, the injury that occurred due to this activity led to criminal liability in R v Rocha, heard by Winchester Crown Court on 19 March 2024. In this article, I will consider the principles that may be relevant when determining civil liability in this case. Although the facts of this case are unusually uncommon (or at least, one would hope), these principles are of significance to the modern ‘gig economy’.

The pizza in question was ordered on 14 December 2022 by Stephen Jenkinson, who used the Deliveroo app to request that it be delivered to his home near Aldershot, Hampshire.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll