header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

A level playing field

Professional athletes should have the right to challenge their regulatory bodies, says John Cooper

Any lawyer who has appeared in front of a regulatory tribunal, perhaps more particularly if you are representing a sports person, will realise what a foreboding and alien environment it is, when compared to the normal principle of what constitutes a fair hearing and a just decision.

It is undesirable that the public courts should be suffocated by disputes which can properly be resolved within the regulatory framework, but if that is acknowledged as a sensible and practical way forward, it should also follow that the regulatory tribunals should be perceived as fair and without bias. But perhaps even more fundamental than that, the member should be allowed access to the disciplinary process to begin with—something which does not seem to be happening.

Sporting lawyers
The involvement of lawyers in the business of sports regulatory bodies has been increasing over the last few years or so. The approach is simple. Deal with disputes with members who have offended the contractual terms of their membership, administratively, rather than as a disciplinary procedure.

Licensing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll