header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

A level playing field

Professional athletes should have the right to challenge their regulatory bodies, says John Cooper

Any lawyer who has appeared in front of a regulatory tribunal, perhaps more particularly if you are representing a sports person, will realise what a foreboding and alien environment it is, when compared to the normal principle of what constitutes a fair hearing and a just decision.

It is undesirable that the public courts should be suffocated by disputes which can properly be resolved within the regulatory framework, but if that is acknowledged as a sensible and practical way forward, it should also follow that the regulatory tribunals should be perceived as fair and without bias. But perhaps even more fundamental than that, the member should be allowed access to the disciplinary process to begin with—something which does not seem to be happening.

Sporting lawyers
The involvement of lawyers in the business of sports regulatory bodies has been increasing over the last few years or so. The approach is simple. Deal with disputes with members who have offended the contractual terms of their membership, administratively, rather than as a disciplinary procedure.

Licensing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll