header-logo header-logo

24 February 2012 / James Naylor
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Letter of the law

A contract for the sale of land must incorporate all agreed terms, warns James Naylor

The recent case of Francis v F Berndes Ltd & Ors [2011] EWHC 3377 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 05 (Jan), provides a convenient reminder that a contract for the sale of land must incorporate all the terms that the parties have agreed upon and anything short of that benchmark will result in the failure of the agreement.

Facts

In Francis, a telephone offer was made to purchase a property for £50,000; such offer being subsequently orally accepted. An express oral agreement was thus achieved. There followed a letter that read, in part, as follows: “Following [the above] discussions…, I can confirm that we are prepared to sell the freehold of the Coolbury Club, workshop and flat for a purchase consideration of £50,000.”

However, the vendor subsequently declined to sell, occasioning the commencement of litigation between the parties. This was met by an application for summary judgment to dismiss the claim, on the basis that the letter did not meet the terms of s 2(1) of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll