header-logo header-logo

10 October 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Lethal weapon: knife crime & the law

He is charged with carrying a knife: Alec Samuels examines the related possibilities & outcomes
  • Are there any defences or mitigating circumstances that are available to someone that has been charged with carrying a knife?
  • The law is scattered over several different statutes and unconsolidated. When will we get a reformed modern code of criminal law, evidence and procedure, and sentencing?

If charged with carrying a knife or having a bladed article under the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, s 1; the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959; the Criminal Justice Act 1988, s 139; the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 SI 2019; and the Offensive Weapons Act 2019…is there any defence or mitigation?

The knife must be proved by the prosecution to be an offensive weapon, either per se or otherwise. The weapon is likely to be per se offensive if in reality there is no proper use likely or possible, eg the only use of a flick knife (defined in 2019 Act s 43) or a butterfly knife being to cause injury,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll