header-logo header-logo

Lessons in without prejudice

Peter Crampin QC & Simon Williams discuss the outcome & effect of Ofulue v Bossert

By its judgment in Ofulue v Bossert [2009] UKHL 16, [2009] All ER (D) 119 (Mar) the House of Lords has reaffirmed the public policy behind the “without prejudice” rule and made clear that, where an acknowledgment of title satisfying ss 29 and 30 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) is made in a statement of case, time runs from the date of, or the date of service of, the statement of case.

Their lordships had been invited to consider these two issues by Agnes Ofulue who, with her husband Emmanuel, had in September 2003 commenced proceedings against Erica Bossert for possession of a Victorian townhouse in London, of which they were the registered owners, on the grounds that she was a trespasser. They were met with the defence that their title had been extinguished by the adverse possession of Ms Bossert for more than 12 years pursuant to LA 1980, ss 15 and 17 and a counterclaim for a declaration to that effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll