header-logo header-logo

13 July 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Lessons from the Luddites

nlj_7754_backpage

Today’s ‘Luddites’ need to find imaginative & effective solutions to opposing change, says Geoffrey Bindman

There is wide acceptance of the view that advances in computerisation and artificial intelligence will decimate professional employment in a very few years. Those who lose their jobs to machines will rightly be angry if they are consigned to poverty and indolence. Yet those who question the labour-saving benefits of new technology and seek to moderate the impact of these advances are sometimes pejoratively referred to as Luddites. Who were the Luddites?

Originally they were weavers and other textile workers in Northern England who, in the second decade of the 19th century, resisted the replacement of their employment by newly invented machines. The name came from an obscure and possibly mythical figure known as King Ludd or Ned Ludd, thought by some to have lived in Sherwood Forest at the same time as Robin Hood.

Ludd’s disciples, banding together at night with blackened faces, were machine-breakers. They attacked the mills which housed the new machines, destroying as many as they could lay their hands on.

Desperate plight

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll