header-logo header-logo

03 April 2019
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Less prison, more rehabilitation

Committee calls for abolition of short sentences & criticises government’s ‘crisis management’ approach

Judges in the criminal courts should be given powers to monitor non-custodial interventions and short sentences should be abolished, an 18-month parliamentary inquiry has recommended.

The Justice Committee report, Prison Population 2022, backs justice secretary David Gauke’s calls, made in a speech in February, for an end to short prison sentences, and suggests the government consider abolishing sentences of 12 months or less. It also points out that the judiciary is entitled to expect that those who are subject to probation supervision have good quality interventions and an opportunity to move on with their life. The government, it says, should consider the value of judicial monitoring as a medium-term priority.

The committee’s report found the government’s current approach to prison funding unsustainable in the medium to long-term. The prison population has nearly doubled in size in the past 25 years, from 44,246 in 1993 to 82,384 in December 2018, and many prisons are now overcrowded. This is because proportionately more offenders are being given a custodial sentence and custodial sentences are becoming longer.

The inquiry heard how staffing shortages and other disruptions have severely undermined the delivery of rehabilitative services in prisons, including education, mental health treatment, substance misuse treatment and offending behaviour programmes. The committee concluded that this creates wasted costs.

Moreover, the nature of the prison population has changed―a higher proportion of offenders are in prison for serious violent or sexual offences. The average age is rising, and many prisoners have mental health problems, such as psychosis, or learning disabilities.

Chair of the Justice Committee, Bob Neill MP, said: ‘The Ministry of Justice and Treasury are guilty of a crisis management approach to prisons that has been failing for the past five years.

‘Throwing money at the prison system to tackle multiple issues takes funding away from external rehabilitative programmes that could stem or reverse many of the problems. Proper investment in rehabilitation services would really work.

‘Better access to support and opportunities for offenders would reduce repeat imprisonment, save money, and start to alleviate pressures on jails. Poor access to rehabilitation while in prison creates boredom and frustration, with a cyclical impact on the degradation of regimes and safety.’

Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll