header-logo header-logo

07 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal reactions to Reality TV

Advice for debtors faced with bailiffs & a camera crew

Reality TV has thrown up new challenges for debt lawyers as well as a never-ending cast of “wannabes”. Defamation and privacy actions are two possible means of recourse for anyone who finds bailiffs and a camera crew at their front door, according to barrister Stephen Boyd, of Selborne Chambers, writing in this week’s NLJ

“In showing the enforcement officer attending at premises, the innuendo would be that the subject of the execution was a judgment debtor,” he says. 

“This would be actionable, if false.” However, existing caselaw makes this line of attack unlikely to succeed.

Boyd offers advice on what the debtor should do when first confronted, and in the following days. “Consideration should be given to challenging the right of the television company to screen what footage they have on the basis of breach of the subject’s Art 8 rights. 

They should be asked to provide, say, 10 days’ notice of their intention to screen the film so that appropriate steps can be taken to apply for an injunction,” he says.

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll