header-logo header-logo

02 March 2022
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Legal News , International justice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Legal profession supports Ukraine

Lawyers condemn ‘act of war’ and warn of exposure to sanctions

Lawyers have expressed solidarity with Ukraine and called on the government to assist refugees.

In a joint statement, Bar leaders in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Ireland and the Faculty of Advocates in Scotland, unequivocally condemned the invasion as an ‘act of war’ and ‘a gross violation of international law’.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The Law Society stands in solidarity with the Ukrainian people, the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Ukrainian Bar Association.

‘We also stand with the Russian people who oppose their government’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, and lawyers who are defending the rule of law in the region.’

Meanwhile, lawyers have been advised to keep a close eye on client exposure to Russian sanctions, including in supply chains.

Pinsent Masons senior associate Stacy Keen, a specialist in sanctions, said any ramping-up of sanctions is likely to affect a far wider range of businesses than previous sector-based measures, hitting not just UK oil exploration and production companies but other strategic sectors such as the information, communications and digital technologies sectors.

‘Businesses should plan on the basis that the sanctions already announced are just the first wave,’ Keen said.

‘They should urgently be identifying not just Russian and Ukrainian business partners but also non-Russian/Ukrainian counterparties that have a significant exposure to these countries.’

However, reports this week that Foreign Secretary Liz Truss briefed MPs that London law firms are delaying sanctions against Russian oligarchs prompted raised eyebrows in the profession.

Human rights barrister Jessica Simor QC tweeted: ‘Law firms can’t hold it up. Only a court could. Are there any court orders? I doubt it.’

Boyce responded, on behalf of the Law Society: ‘It’s the job of solicitors to represent their clients, whoever they may be, so that the courts act fairly. 

‘This is how the public can be confident they live in a country that respects the rule of law―unlike Putin’s tyrannical regime. Solicitors are highly regulated and are not allowed to bring spurious objections to processes―if they challenge the government’s actions, it’s because they think the government is at risk of breaking its own rules.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll