header-logo header-logo

07 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Legal profession brainstorms Brexit

Law Society’s research suggests long term pain may follow short term gains

Lawyers could enjoy a short-term “Brexit bonanza” but would be disproportionately affected in the long-term, the Law Society’s chief executive has warned.

Law firms have been busy compiling advice in the run-up to the 23 June referendum. Herbert Smith, for example, has compiled a detailed briefing on the topic and Allen & Overy’s Global Law Intelligence Unit has published a paper providing a lawyer’s view on a broad range of associated legal issues.

Writing in NLJ this week, Catherine Dixon, chief executive of the Law Society, which does not hold a position on Brexit, says: “In the short term some solicitors could enjoy their widely trailed ‘Brexit bonanza’ as agreements are unpicked, contracts altered, new domestic rules written and the legal complexities of any changed relationship with the EU unravelled.

“However, based on an independent assessment we commissioned by Oxford Economics [The UK legal services sector and the EU], in the longer term a UK withdrawal is likely to disadvantage the legal services sector disproportionately when compared to other comparative areas of economic activity. This is due to the work we do for other sectors which are likely to be adversely affected themselves by Brexit.”

Lawyers—In for Britain, a group of British lawyers, published a detailed report last month setting out the case for EU membership. John Davies, Chairman, says: “Our conclusion is that the UK is stronger, safer and better off in the EU.”

However, this report was criticised by Lawyers for Britain, a group chaired by Martin Howe QC, which is campaigning for Britain to leave the current treaties and build a new relationship with the EU which preserves our trading links. They argue that the prime minister’s renegotiation changes little and reveals the UK’s lack of influence and the inability of the EU to reform. They argue that the EU reforms poor laws too slowly or not at all and that there are many pitfalls to EU regulatory harmonisation.

Deloitte’s latest quarterly survey of chief financial officers found that a potential Brexit is the top concern for Britain’s biggest businesses at the moment, yet 53% have “no plans” in place.

Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll