header-logo header-logo

17 November 2011
Issue: 7490 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal ombudsman fines solicitor

Solicitor fined £5,000 for failing to cooperate with ombudsman

A solicitor has been fined £5,000 plus £15,500 costs by the high court for failing to co-operate with an investigation by the legal ombudsman (LeO). Howard Young, a solicitor who practised for CMG Law in Bolton, failed to provide documents to enable the ombudsman to investigate a case.

Mr Justice Lindblom, the presiding judge, said he would consider imposing a custodial sentence in future cases. Lawyers risk an unlimited fine or a two year prison sentence if they fail to co-operate.

Chief ombudsman, Adam Sampson, said: “We are pleased with the clear support from the courts for the ombudsman’s role.”

Issue: 7490 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll