header-logo header-logo

03 January 2019 / Steven Gasztowicz KC
Issue: 7822 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A legal history of Leicester Square

​Steven Gasztowicz QC marks the 170th birthday of Tulk v Moxhay

  • Tulk v Moxhay (1848) and the birth of restrictive covenants.
  • An examination, 170 years later, of some of the human and historical aspects of the case – and the way they have affected the law – and Leicester Square in London.

Can a case have a birthday? Well, no, not really, of course. However, 22 December 2018 marked the 170th anniversary of the decision of the Lord Chancellor in Tulk v Moxhay (1848) SC 2 PH 774, [1843-60] All ER Rep 9.

This is the celebrated case which is seen as representing the birth of restrictive covenants in English land law, so the reference to birthdays is not entirely inappropriate.

Restrictive covenants are, of course, contractual promises not to use land in a particular way, which are enforceable not just against present, but also against future, owners and occupiers of the land. You do not have to be a land lawyer to appreciate the human and historical side of the case, however.

On the anniversary of the decision,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll