header-logo header-logo

08 September 2020
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Legal aid under pressure

MPs are holding an inquiry into the future of legal aid, in light of difficulties getting legal aid assistance in some areas as well as lawyers’ concerns about fees, reduced work during the COVID-19 outbreak and other pressures

The Justice Committee issued a call for evidence this week and is keen to hear from practitioners and clients about their experience. The Committee, chaired by Sir Bob Neill QC MP, aims to look ahead to the next decade of legal aid, and to identify challenges facing clients and providers and how they might be tackled. It is especially keen to hear about the sustainability of the legal aid market, the impact of COVID-19 and the increasing reliance on digital technology to deliver advice and representation.

The inquiry will also look at how LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) has affected access to justice. The Committee previously looked at civil legal aid following LASPO, in 2014, highlighting issues such as the increase in litigants in person and low take-up of the exceptional cases funding scheme. It looked into criminal legal aid in 2018,

The government’s own post-implementation review of LASPO, published in February 2019, concluded that LASPO had been ‘partially successful’ at meeting its four objectives of saving money, targeting legal aid at those who need it most, discouraging unnecessary litigation and delivering better value for money.

Law Society president Simon Davis said there were ‘swathes of the country with no or vanishingly little legal aid provision for issues such as housing and community care, as well as a dwindling number of criminal law solicitors, because the system for so long has been starved of funding.

‘Growing numbers of people are navigating the justice system unrepresented―with no legal advice to help them enforce their rights.’

Submit responses by 5pm on 19 October via: bit.ly/338AOxQ.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll