header-logo header-logo

26 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal aid safety net is “lawful”

The exceptional case funding scheme, which helps those who fail to secure legal aid for civil matters, is lawful, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Lord Justice Laws overturned an earlier ruling by Mr Justice Collins that the scheme was complex, rigid and unlawful as it gave rise “to an unacceptable risk that an individual will not be able to obtain legal aid where failure to provide it would be a breach of that individual’s rights”.

The scheme was intended to be a safety net for claimants who fell through the gaps after the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) came into force. However, there has been a low take-up so far. The Ministry of Justice expected about 6,000 applications to be made each year but last year only 1,172 applications were made and 226 granted.

In The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464, Laws LJ acknowledged there had been “troubling” difficulties with the scheme but said: “The learning curve will continue.”

He added: “No doubt the Legal Aid Agency and the Lord Chancellor will be astute to look for improvements, and will do so on a continuing basis.”

Dissenting, Lord Justice Briggs said: “In my judgment the defects in the procedures for applying for [the scheme] in the system in place at the time of the hearing before Collins J were systematic and inherent, to the extent that rendered the scheme inherently unfair, so that I would have been disposed to dismiss this appeal.”

 
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll