header-logo header-logo

18 January 2023
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Legal aid proves popular with voters

Members of the public across the three main parties support legal aid, research has shown.

A poll of 2,000 people by the Law Society this month found 84% of Conservative, 95% of Labour and 97% of Liberal Democrat voters in agreement that legal aid is a good thing. It also revealed the public believe legal aid is more widely available than it actually is.

More than half (53%) thought legal aid is available for domestic violence cases, while 73% said it should be available—in fact it is available only if there is an injunction.

Some 44% thought legal aid is available for employment cases and 68% said it should be available, while in reality it is only available for discrimination cases. 42% thought it is available for rented housing issues and 66% said it should be available—in fact it is available only if living conditions are a threat to health or at repossession stage.

The research was conducted in the first week of January, the day after the Ministry of Justice announced the long-awaited civil legal aid review, which is due to publish its final report in 2024.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Services are collapsing now. We cannot afford to wait until 2024 for investment.’

Last week, the Law Society sent a letter before action to the Lord Chancellor, Dominic Raab, urging him to increase defence solicitors’ legal aid pay rates or face a judicial review.

Shuja said: ‘What is so frustrating is that a rational policy path was identified in Lord Bellamy’s comprehensive review and largely accepted, including 15% for barristers, but the key recommendation affecting solicitors—who were viewed as being in the most “parlous state”—was rejected.’

While Raab has claimed solicitors are being given a 15% rise, Law Society analysis of the offer found the increase actually amounted to 9%.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll