header-logo header-logo

04 November 2020
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid in dire straits

Legal aid services are on the brink of collapse, CILEx (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has warned

Responding last week to the Justice Select Committee’s inquiry on ‘The future of legal aid’, CILEx said legal aid was already at a critical stage before the pandemic, with members reporting growing problems with recruitment and retention due to repeated government cuts and many firms moving away from the legal aid sector altogether. The COVID-19 pandemic has piled on further financial hardship.

CILEx President Craig Tickner, a specialist criminal defence advocate, said: ‘The precarious financial stability of legal aid firms pre-dates the current Covid crisis.

‘For as long as we can remember we have been calling for proper funding and additional resources, engaging with review processes such as the Criminal Legal Aid Review. With COVID-19 now hovering over remaining providers like the grim reaper, action is needed now. Any delay will be too late.’

In its response, the organisation warned that funding cuts caused by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) had disincentivised practitioners from working in legal aid and created ‘incessant court backlogs’ through under-resourcing the sector. Consequently, the legal aid market was ‘increasingly dependent on a limited pool of providers to provide an unrealistic level of output, worsened by new initiatives, such as extended opening hours for the court estate’.

As well as increased funding for legal aid work, CILEx called for earlier access to payment for legal aid work to help financially precarious firms, ‘In order to help safeguard income streams, manage risk and protect the financial longevity of providers in supplying legal aid services’.

The Justice Select Committee inquiry aims to look at the major challenges facing clients and providers, market sustainability, impact of COVID-19 and the increasing reliance on digital technology. Read more at: bit.ly/338AOxQ.

Issue: 7909 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll