header-logo header-logo

20 October 2017
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid: humans & justice must come first

Successive governments have reduced legal aid to the level of ‘mundane horse trading of practical politics’, says Geoffrey Bindman QC.

In an article this week, the NLJ columnist says legal aid was dealt its heaviest blow by LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) but the recent Bach Commission proposal for a new Right to Justice Act offers fresh hope.

‘By a striking coincidence the constitutional supremacy of access to justice has almost simultaneously been re-asserted by the Supreme Court in Unison v Lord Chancellor [where employment tribunal fees were held to be unlawful],’ he writes. ‘In outlawing the imposition of oppressive fees in employment tribunals the court highlighted the right of all citizens to access to justice as a fundamental constitutional principle.’ (See Comment)

Issue: 7766 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll