header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Legal aid funding

In brief

Vulnerable people are to be offered better access to legal aid after the Legal Service Commission (LSC) has decided to buy more than 40,000 extra cases of face-to-face civil legal aid. The invitation to tender for work will include 10,000 family law cases, with particular emphasis on domestic abuse and children, and 30,000 cases of social welfare law. The £10m scheme has been made available through greater efficiency in the legal aid system. Carolyn Regan, chief executive of the LSC says: “We are prioritising this funding for those organisations that can address a range of legal problems, minimising the need for onward referrals between agencies.”

Issue: 7330 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll