header-logo header-logo

30 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid fees rise for police station & youth court

Criminal legal aid solicitors have been offered a pay rise for police station and youth court work

£16m will be used to increase fees for duty solicitor work in police stations, and the fee scheme simplified by raising the lowest charges, according to the eight-week Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation published this week, Crime lower: criminal legal aid.

Currently, fixed fees for police station work vary by geographic area, with 245 different fees across England and Wales. The fees were set in 2008, based on the average cost then of a case in each area.

The consultation proposes two options for harmonising the fee schemes. The first is to increase 174 schemes to £225.63 (excl VAT), with no rise for fee schemes above this amount (all 32 London schemes and 39 non-London schemes are above this amount). The second, and the MoJ’s preferred option, is to increase 173 non-London schemes to £223.52 (excl VAT) and 26 London schemes to £264,45 (excl VAT).

Youth court fees for the most serious offences will be raised by £548 per case, accounting for £5.1m of additional funds.

The funding comes from £21.1m per year allocated to longer-term reforms from the financial year 2024-2025, as part of the MoJ’s response to the Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review (CLAIR). The CLAIR, which reported in 2021, found the police station and youth court fee schemes outdated and not reflective of the complexity of work involved. This week’s consultation addresses how the £21.1m is distributed.

The fee rises apply to new work from summer 2024.

Lord Chancellor Alex Chalk said duty solicitors ‘play a critical role in ensuring access to justice by giving people legal advice, often at antisocial hours and at a moment’s notice’£548 (not inc. VAT) fee increase in the Youth Court.

However, Law Society president Nick Emmerson said the extra money was ‘a small step in the right direction’ but ‘still leaves the increased expenditure below that identified by Lord Bellamy as “the minimum necessary”… Moreover, the impact of these increases, including those announced [this week] has been wiped out by inflation’.

The consultation ends on 28 March.

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll