header-logo header-logo

10 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid evidence victory

Five-year time limit abandoned for domestic violence victims

A major evidential obstacle to legal aid for domestic abuse victims has been dropped by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) following a campaign by lawyers and support organisations.

As of this week, there will be no time limit on abuse evidence in private family law disputes-previously, victims had to prove they had suffered, or been at risk of suffering, domestic abuse or child abuse in the previous five years. Opponents said the restrictions prevented about 50% of domestic abuse victims receiving legal aid.

The range of documents accepted as evidence of abuse has also been widened, and will now include statements from domestic violence support organisations and housing support officers.

The Court of Appeal held the evidence requirements set out in LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) 2012), unlawful in February 2016, in R (on the application of) Rights of Women v Lord Chancellor [2016] EWCA Civ 91. The MoJ made the reforms after consulting with charities and legal bodies, including the charity Rights of Women, which brought the legal challenge.

Carol Storer, director of Legal Aid Practitioners Group, said less than half of victims fleeing domestic abuse have been able to access legal aid due to the evidence requirements.

‘The evidence was time limited, failing to recognise that the impact and risk associated with abuse can be lifelong,’ she said.

‘The ability to obtain the necessary evidence is difficult and random and often has a cost involved. Obtaining it is usually inconsistent with the lifestyle of the vast majority of victims fleeing domestic abuse.’ Moreover, obtaining evidence of emotional, psychological, financial abuse or coercive control rather than physical abuse was often difficult.

‘It has taken a long time to bring about these changes, and there are still many hurdles in place.’

Law Society vice president Christina Blacklaws said the reform ‘will make it easier for victims to qualify for legal aid and access essential help and support’.

Former justice minister Dominic Raab said: ‘We have listened to victims’ groups and carefully reviewed the criteria for legal aid for victims of domestic abuse in family cases.’

 

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll