header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid drop ‘concerning’

Applications for legal aid in civil cases where there was evidence of domestic violence or child abuse fell by 12% in the final quarter of 2020, according to government statistics
Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce described the decrease, in the Ministry of Justice legal aid statistics quarterly figures, as ‘concerning’.

‘At a time when we know there has been considerable escalation in domestic abuse cases, this reduction raises questions regarding the barrier to legal aid that the “domestic violence gateway” requirements represent and we continue to call on government to allow solicitors to certify that a person is a victim of abuse for the purposes of obtaining legal aid,’ she said.

The statistics, published last week, also recorded a 7% drop in applications for exceptional case funding and a 33% fall in housing work, compared to the same quarter in the previous year.

Boyce said: ‘For the Housing Possession Court Duty Scheme (HPCDS), there were only 461 cases compared to 7,740 in the same quarter for the previous year.

‘This reflects the government policy of suspending possession claims, which we support, but which demonstrates the considerable financial pressure that is being placed on the legal aid housing provider base due to the reduction in cashflow. We continue to call on government to provide additional financial support to ensure the provider base does not collapse.

‘We are also concerned by the continued decrease in exceptional case funding applications―this suggests the pandemic has increased the challenge in making these applications.’

Meanwhile, lawyers and interested parties are invited to respond to the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid’s call for evidence before 7 May.

Sir Christopher Bellamy, Chair of the Review, wants to hear how the system as a whole can be improved and placed on a sustainable footing for the future. Submit responses to the review online at bit.ly/3fqtwNK or by email to iclar@justice.gov.uk.

 

Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll