header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid danger

News In Brief

The government’s attempt at reform of the legal aid system has become lost and is in need of renewing in order to protect vulnerable groups in society, says a discussion paper from the Bar Council. The paper, Legal Aid and the Public Interest: Towards an Effective Public Private Partnership, sets out the Council’s vision of a “world-call legal system” and argues for a “conditional legal aid fund” to provide legal services to those that cannot afford to pay. Successful claimants would then make a proportional payment to the fund, in addition to costs recovered. The paper also claims that the reforms are endangering the future of the legal system by making it less financially secure.

Issue: 7322 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll