header-logo header-logo

08 March 2023
Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Procedure & practice , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid changes for family cases

The government has extended legal aid in private and public family law cases, and changed the evidential requirements for domestic abuse.

As of 1 March, legal aid is available for both parents and those with parental responsibilities in cases concerning applications for placement and adoption orders and involving local authorities. The rules change brings the merits test in line with cases covered by the Special Children Act 1989.

Also from 1 March, where supporting evidence of domestic abuse is required, legal aid applicants can choose whether to have their assessment carried out by health professionals over the telephone or by video conference instead of in person.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the change took down the ‘additional hurdle’ of face-to-face appointments, but warned the current Domestic Abuse Gateway does not provide for the recognition of emotional, controlling or coercive abuse. She suggested solicitors experienced in domestic abuse cases be authorised to confirm a client is a victim for the purpose of obtaining legal aid.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll