header-logo header-logo

08 March 2023
Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Procedure & practice , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid changes for family cases

The government has extended legal aid in private and public family law cases, and changed the evidential requirements for domestic abuse.

As of 1 March, legal aid is available for both parents and those with parental responsibilities in cases concerning applications for placement and adoption orders and involving local authorities. The rules change brings the merits test in line with cases covered by the Special Children Act 1989.

Also from 1 March, where supporting evidence of domestic abuse is required, legal aid applicants can choose whether to have their assessment carried out by health professionals over the telephone or by video conference instead of in person.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the change took down the ‘additional hurdle’ of face-to-face appointments, but warned the current Domestic Abuse Gateway does not provide for the recognition of emotional, controlling or coercive abuse. She suggested solicitors experienced in domestic abuse cases be authorised to confirm a client is a victim for the purpose of obtaining legal aid.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll