header-logo header-logo

25 July 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid: an anniversary

David Burrows marks the birthday of legal aid with an examination of its history & how far we have strayed from it

Legal aid will be 70 years old next week on 30 July 2019. The original act—Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949—received Royal Assent on that day. The idea of legal help for poor people, however, in limited forms was known from medieval times. This article briefly traces the history of legal aid up to the 1949 Act, through to its heyday in the 1970s, and then its decline to its modern version in Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012), with thanks to Legal Aid and Advice Under the Legal Aid Acts 1949 to 1964  (ADM Oulton and EJT Matthews, 1971).

The ‘first English [legal aid] statute’, say Matthews and Oulton, is a statute of 1495; though there was legislation in Scotland 70 years earlier. The 1495 statute was intended ‘to admit such persons as are poor to sue in forma pauperis’. Poor persons were not to be charged fees for issue of a writ (court process)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll