header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

R (on the application of Duncan Lewis (Solicitors) Ltd) v Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 2498 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 355 (Jul)

The claimant solicitors’ firm issued judicial review proceedings, challenging the defendant lord chancellor’s decision to reduce its claim for costs to nil in a case where work had been carried out for a client financially eligible for legal aid, although at the time the lord chancellor asserted that the firm had not conclusively established that to its satisfaction. The Administrative Court, in allowing the application, held that the lord chancellor’s decision had been based on the answer to the wrong question and would be quashed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll