header-logo header-logo

26 July 2007 / Richard Miller
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid—a bleak future?

Is it too late to prevent a race towards low prices for minimum quality? asks Richard Miller

In these turbulent times when we don’t even know what payment structures legal aid firms will be working under in three months, it is an unenviable task to try to forecast where we will be in three to five years.

Of one thing I am certain. The system we end up with will not look anything like Lord Carter’s blueprint (see Legal Aid—A Market-based Approach to Reform). Some of it misunderstood the legal services market and would not work in practice. The Legal Services Commission (LSC) cannot or will not adopt some of the ideas. The government has repeated that there is no more money, which compromises the principle of competitive tendering.
The government is still putting £2bn per year into legal aid. Much of the work is subject to human rights obligations. The government must ensure access to services in criminal defence, public law, family, mental health and immigration, which account for around three-quarters of the budget. In social welfare law, the arguments are about how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll