header-logo header-logo

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Child law
printer mail-detail

Legal access could help children deprived of liberty

Increasing numbers of deprivation of liberty orders are being made against children, family law campaigners have warned. Yet, in the majority of cases, the parents or carers concerned have no access to legal advice

The charity, Family Rights Group is running a campaign to highlight these orders, which can be made by the family court if a local authority is concerned about risks to the child’s safety or the safety of others. Backing the campaign last week, the Law Society also expressed concern about the lack of legal aid for families.

Statistics published by Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (NFJO) in September showed 1,249 children were subject to the orders in the year to June 2023. The NFJO found that 88.5% of parents and carers were not represented at any hearings in applications made under the High Court’s jurisdiction. NFJO also reported children were sent more than 56 miles away on average to children’s homes, care home services or unregulated placements. 

Deprivation of Liberty Orders allow for children to be placed under severe restrictions. There was a 462% increase in these cases in the three years to 2020/21.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘A parent whose child is subject to care proceedings is entitled to non-means-tested legal aid.

‘However, the same cannot be said for deprivation of liberty cases. Families are instead faced with a stringent means and merits test to establish if they can receive legal aid.

‘We call on the government to remove these barriers.’

Emmerson said: ‘The family court system is facing an increase in deprivation of liberty cases due to a reduction in the number of children in youth custody, a rise in the number of older children coming into care, falling numbers of inpatient child mental health beds and the closure of secure children’s homes.’

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Child law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll