header-logo header-logo

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Child law
printer mail-detail

Legal access could help children deprived of liberty

Increasing numbers of deprivation of liberty orders are being made against children, family law campaigners have warned. Yet, in the majority of cases, the parents or carers concerned have no access to legal advice

The charity, Family Rights Group is running a campaign to highlight these orders, which can be made by the family court if a local authority is concerned about risks to the child’s safety or the safety of others. Backing the campaign last week, the Law Society also expressed concern about the lack of legal aid for families.

Statistics published by Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (NFJO) in September showed 1,249 children were subject to the orders in the year to June 2023. The NFJO found that 88.5% of parents and carers were not represented at any hearings in applications made under the High Court’s jurisdiction. NFJO also reported children were sent more than 56 miles away on average to children’s homes, care home services or unregulated placements. 

Deprivation of Liberty Orders allow for children to be placed under severe restrictions. There was a 462% increase in these cases in the three years to 2020/21.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘A parent whose child is subject to care proceedings is entitled to non-means-tested legal aid.

‘However, the same cannot be said for deprivation of liberty cases. Families are instead faced with a stringent means and merits test to establish if they can receive legal aid.

‘We call on the government to remove these barriers.’

Emmerson said: ‘The family court system is facing an increase in deprivation of liberty cases due to a reduction in the number of children in youth custody, a rise in the number of older children coming into care, falling numbers of inpatient child mental health beds and the closure of secure children’s homes.’

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Child law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll