header-logo header-logo

02 August 2012
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Leeds Utd score in High Court

Football team gain victory over West Yorkshire Police

Leeds United FC won a legal challenge against West Yorkshire Police over the cost of policing matches in the High Court last week.

In Leeds United FC v West Yorkshire Police [2012] EWHC 2113 (QB), Mr Justice Eady, who was shown footage of crowds around Elland Road Stadium, considered to what extent West Yorkshire could recoup policing costs around the “immediate environs of the club premises”. Leeds United currently pays nearly £1m per year towards “special police services”, a fourfold increase from the £250,000 it paid three years ago.

West Yorkshire Police argued it was entitled to levy charges on the club based on a “footprint”, which included policing on the public highway and on publicly accessible land such as car parks and a bus station.

The club did not object to paying for policing within the Elland Road ground or on land owned, leased or controlled by it.

Eady J held that policing on the public highway and on public land fell within “the normal constabulary duty to keep the peace”. Therefore, the costs of such policing were not recoverable from Leeds United.

Sports lawyer Mark Gay, partner at Burges Salmon, who acted for Leeds United, says the judgment also has implications for organisers of rock concerts and demonstrations, who may be asked to pay policing costs. He says: “This is a significant case, which establishes what the police can charge for.”

Issue: 7525 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll