header-logo header-logo

09 August 2018 / Nick Hopkins , Thomas Nicholls
Issue: 7805 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Leasehold enfranchisement

nlj_7805_hopkins-nicholls

Professor Nick Hopkins & Thomas Nicholls outline the Law Commission’s radical plans for leasehold houses & enfranchisement law

  • An overview of the Law Commission’s Leasehold enfranchisement paper, and the reforms it proposes in order to provide a better deal for leaseholders and simplify the enfranchisement regime.

On 19 July 2018, the Law Commission published the Leasehold enfranchisement: A summary of proposed solutions for leaseholders of houses paper. It outlines provisional solutions for reform of enfranchisement law relating specifically to houses. These suggestions will be fully developed in a full Consultation Paper in September, which will address enfranchisement of both houses and flats.

Leasehold houses are not a new phenomenon, but have become more common in recent years—there are now 1.4m, according to the government. But why are houses sold on a leasehold basis at all?

The justification for selling flats on a leasehold basis is apparent: leasehold facilitates the management of blocks despite positive covenants not running with land.

That is less readily applicable to houses, except to enforce positive covenants on an estate. Indeed, many argue that there is no reason for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll