header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008 / Mark Ashley , Matthew Mcgrath
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A leap too far?

Is the bar too low for Human Rights Act cases against NHS trusts? Matthew McGrath and Mark Ashley

Since the Human Rights Act 1998 came into force, public bodies, particularly NHS trusts, have faced possible claims for loss of the right to life where a person in their care has died. The recent Court of Appeal judgment in Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2007] EWCA Civ 1375, [2007] All ER (D) 316 (Dec) provides guidance on how to assess such claims, but in so doing poses more questions than it answers.

Carol Savage had been detained for treatment for paranoid schizophrenia on an open acute psychiatric ward. On 5 July 2005 she absconded and, while out of hospital, committed suicide. A claim was brought by Savage's daughter, in which she alleged that there had been a breach of the deceased's right to life contrary to Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and also a breach of her own right to respect for private and family life contrary to Art 8.

At

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll