header-logo header-logo

03 October 2025 / David Burrows
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Leading the legal aid way

231394
As one of the greats of legal aid retires, David Burrows offers his thoughts on legal aid today & over the past 50 years

Last month, Patrick Allen from Hodge Jones & Allen (HJA) stepped down from the firm he founded in 1977 with Henry Hodge and Peter Jones. About ten years ago, I met Patrick briefly at a lunch hosted by the editor of this journal, though I knew Henry Hodge in the late 80s.

The slightly fuzzy photo (above) of the smiling HJA trio speaks to a variety of thoughts for me of practice in the 1970s and of our optimism as lawyers then. So much seemed possible for many of us, with leadership from such firms as HJA and their tireless support of the legal aid scheme. They paved the way for many of us. Patrick’s retirement is truly the end of an era which began in the 1970s—much kinder times.

I happen to be two weeks older than the original legal aid scheme. The Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949 received royal assent on 30 July 1949.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll