header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 May 2024 / Sophia Purkis
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Lawyers & witnesses: immunity from suit

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
171868
A recent case highlights the importance of immunity from suit, writes Sophia Purkis
  • Lawyers’ and witnesses’ immunity from suit from opposing parties is fundamental to our justice system.
  • Pleading fraud won’t circumvent the principle.
  • However, lawyers and witnesses may still face criminal and/or regulatory sanction if they lie to or mislead the court.

A judgment may be set aside if it were procured by fraud. However, if it is alleged that counsel and solicitors for the allegedly fraudulent party were involved in that fraud, does this prevent the lawyers from being able to rely upon the principle of immunity from suit? No, said Mr Justice Fancourt in El Haddad v Al Rostamani and others [2024] EWHC 448 (Ch), [2024] All ER (D) 43 (Mar).

El Haddad explained

The origins of immunity from suit lie in the attempt to prevent disgruntled defendants in criminal proceedings from bringing defamation claims against those who gave evidence against them. It was extended to all who took part in legal proceedings, including lawyers, judges and jurors in Dawkins v Lord Rokeby

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll