header-logo header-logo

27 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs , Costs
printer mail-detail

Lawyers who make a difference: Sir Rupert Jackson

Lawyers shouldn’t fear judges―they’re ‘gentle’ and like ‘teddy bears’. Those are the words of Sir Rupert Jackson, architect of the civil justice costs reforms (who also confesses he sometimes saw judges as ‘ogres’ when starting out). 

Sir Rupert retired from the Court of Appeal in 2018 after 20 years as a judge and now works from 4 New Square as a mediator and arbitrator.

Sir Rupert speaks to City Law Professor and NLJ columnist Dominic Regan about life on the bench and beyond, in the latest NLJ webinar on lawyers who make a difference. As a young barrister, Sir Rupert specialised in professional negligence, co-authoring the first textbook on the subject, and developed a practice in construction law. As a judge, he was introduced to several new fields of law, including murder trials and judicial reviews. He also provides a fascinating insight into the daily life of a Court of Appeal judge.

It is for his civil costs reforms, however, that Sir Rupert is best known. These reforms, implemented by the government in 2013, have transformed civil litigation. Here, he discusses the process and influences behind his radical proposals, which extend to costs budgeting, sanctions, hot-tubbing, fixed recoverable costs and other reforms.

Click here to watch the webinar in full.

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll