header-logo header-logo

09 January 2015
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lawyers under pressure

Excessive workloads and disciplinary issues were the most common causes of stress cited by callers to lawyers’ charity LawCare in 2014.

High street private client lawyers were the most likely to experience stress (24%) closely followed by litigators (22%) and commercial (18%).

Despite current concerns with legal aid fee cuts and competitive tendering, criminal lawyers accounted for only 7% of calls.

Of the 63% of cases where callers were able to identify a specific cause for their problem, 27% (a 5% increase on the previous year) while 20% were worried about disciplinary issues (up from 16%). 15% complained of bullying while 14% identified financial problems as the root of their concerns, and 9% feared or had faced redundancy.

Overall, LawCare opened fewer case files last year (473 compared to 515 in 2013). Three-quarters of these concerned stress, while 12% were suffering from depression and 5% had issues involving alcohol.

Women made up two-thirds of the callers, and just over a third were trainees or less than five years' qualified.

One in 10 were trainees in Scotland or England and Wales. More than half were solicitors, 5% were chartered legal executives and 11% were barristers.

Elizabeth Rimmer, LawCare chief executive, says that anyone feeling stressed or anxious should remember that they are not alone: “Please call us and talk in confidence with one of our experienced and supportive coordinators, we can provide a listening ear and signpost you to further help. We have helped thousands of lawyers throughout the UK and we understand what it can be like managing a demanding legal career. If you don’t feel ready to call us then please visit our website where you will find a range of information materials that could help.

“It’s not always easy to talk with colleagues or family about worries or concerns, and that’s where we come in. Having someone listen who won’t judge you can be a great relief, many of our callers say that it’s really helpful to talk through their worries and by the end of the call feel better able to take the next steps. Some callers have more complex needs and we can put them in touch with a volunteer LawCare supporter to provide ongoing help. Our supporters are drawn from the legal community and many of them have first-hand experience of personal or professional difficulties.”

The charity helps lawyers, legal professionals and staff, and their families with issues such as stress, alcoholism and other addictions, and runs a confidential helpline. LawCare’s helpline is open 365 days a year on 0800 279 6888.

Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll