header-logo header-logo

19 November 2015
Issue: 7678 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers & the threat of social media

Some 85% of US and UK corporate counsel at Fortune 1000 companies fear social media could push a minor problem into a major crisis.

However, these concerns do not necessarily translate into action.

The lawyers believe social media poses a risk to what 91% of them described as their company’s greatest asset, its reputation, but do not believe there is a legal risk and tend not to become heavily involved in planning for mitigation and response.

That’s according to a report by media managers Weber Shandwick and KRC Research, Social Media’s Role in Crisis Management: A Call for Greater Legal Vigilance. It is based on a survey of 100 senior and mid-level corporate counsel (50 in the US and 50 in the UK) who advise on risk, reputation and brand protection.

“Our research suggests that in-house lawyers are underestimating an important area of risk,” says Rod Clayton, co-head of global crisis and issues at Weber Shandwick.

“Social media has its own set of challenges, and legal counsel should ask themselves if they’re ready to address what can be powerful threats to reputation.”

Only one in five counsel have experienced a social media crisis, and those who have reported that the outcome was a decline in employee morale and retention rather than a specific legal issue. Only half the lawyers had undergone training on the impact social media has on their company. Only one in five counsel said the legal department was “very” involved in social media crisis planning, and counsel spent an average of 2.4% of their own time on the topic. Less than half said their company would be “excellent” or “very good” at responding to a social media problem.

The report offers guidelines for in-house counsel to more effectively engage in social media crisis preparation and response in order to safeguard corporate reputations from digital attacks.

Issue: 7678 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll